<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for davidmelkevik.co.uk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davidmelkevik.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davidmelkevik.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>It&#039;s Screenwriting-tastic!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 19:54:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Melkevik On Melkevik by Dave</title>
		<link>http://davidmelkevik.wordpress.com/2009/12/04/melkevik-on-melkevik/#comment-243</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 19:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidmelkevik.wordpress.com/?p=861#comment-243</guid>
		<description>Fingers and toes crossed.

Definitely a personal career choice and not a view at SWF that spec features were the way to go (In fact novels is what Julian Friedman is advising screenwriters to write!).  I went to two talks that made me think that focusing on feature writing is the way for me to go. One was Janice Day&#039;s &quot;How To Make A Living As A Writer&quot; and she said writers need to think where thir compass is set i.e. what&#039;s our ultimate goal and then work back through the stages involved in getting there.  Without sounding too pompous, my ultimate goal has always been to make a living writing Hollywood features (yep, that sounded pompous) and if I work back the stages that are needed to get there I honestly don&#039;t think writing for TV/radio is necessary. 

The second talk, and career-wise the most useful I attended, was on marketing yourself with &quot;PR and marketing guru&quot; Kate Adamson.  I won&#039;t do Kate&#039;s talk justice here (so I&#039;ll probably post it on the blog next week) but her argument is that screenwriters need to establish themselves as a brand -- so become known as the go-to-guy for a particular type of script. Consequently if you write children&#039;s dramas, radio plays, features, etc. you dilute the brand. 
 
So these two sessions got me thinking and I realised that I&#039;m interested in creating a world that exists only for two hours not one that I revisit week after week.   

Finally I should also point that a part of this decision is purely down due to the time I have available to me. When you add up all the time that&#039;s needed for a screenwriter to spend on just the things that aren&#039;t even the screenwriting (blogging, networking, reading other people&#039;s blogs, reading scripts, reading books. watching movies) you do have to be smart with your time and think how&#039;s it best spent.

Does this mean I&#039;ll never try and write another sitcom, TV script... depends if Bain and Armstrong are asking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fingers and toes crossed.</p>
<p>Definitely a personal career choice and not a view at SWF that spec features were the way to go (In fact novels is what Julian Friedman is advising screenwriters to write!).  I went to two talks that made me think that focusing on feature writing is the way for me to go. One was Janice Day&#8217;s &#8220;How To Make A Living As A Writer&#8221; and she said writers need to think where thir compass is set i.e. what&#8217;s our ultimate goal and then work back through the stages involved in getting there.  Without sounding too pompous, my ultimate goal has always been to make a living writing Hollywood features (yep, that sounded pompous) and if I work back the stages that are needed to get there I honestly don&#8217;t think writing for TV/radio is necessary. </p>
<p>The second talk, and career-wise the most useful I attended, was on marketing yourself with &#8220;PR and marketing guru&#8221; Kate Adamson.  I won&#8217;t do Kate&#8217;s talk justice here (so I&#8217;ll probably post it on the blog next week) but her argument is that screenwriters need to establish themselves as a brand &#8212; so become known as the go-to-guy for a particular type of script. Consequently if you write children&#8217;s dramas, radio plays, features, etc. you dilute the brand. </p>
<p>So these two sessions got me thinking and I realised that I&#8217;m interested in creating a world that exists only for two hours not one that I revisit week after week.   </p>
<p>Finally I should also point that a part of this decision is purely down due to the time I have available to me. When you add up all the time that&#8217;s needed for a screenwriter to spend on just the things that aren&#8217;t even the screenwriting (blogging, networking, reading other people&#8217;s blogs, reading scripts, reading books. watching movies) you do have to be smart with your time and think how&#8217;s it best spent.</p>
<p>Does this mean I&#8217;ll never try and write another sitcom, TV script&#8230; depends if Bain and Armstrong are asking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Melkevik On Melkevik by Jez Freedman</title>
		<link>http://davidmelkevik.wordpress.com/2009/12/04/melkevik-on-melkevik/#comment-242</link>
		<dc:creator>Jez Freedman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 14:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidmelkevik.wordpress.com/?p=861#comment-242</guid>
		<description>best interview I&#039;ve read in ages. Can I ask a follow up? Ok I&#039;m just going to anyway. Can you elaborate a little on the focus switch to solely features? Is this a personal career choice or was the general feeling at the SWF such that spec features were the way to go?

Guiding lights deuxieme for me too. fingers crossed buddy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>best interview I&#8217;ve read in ages. Can I ask a follow up? Ok I&#8217;m just going to anyway. Can you elaborate a little on the focus switch to solely features? Is this a personal career choice or was the general feeling at the SWF such that spec features were the way to go?</p>
<p>Guiding lights deuxieme for me too. fingers crossed buddy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Ten Greatest Action Movie Montages Ever! by Thunder Badger</title>
		<link>http://davidmelkevik.wordpress.com/2009/11/20/the-ten-greatest-action-movie-montages-ever/#comment-241</link>
		<dc:creator>Thunder Badger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidmelkevik.wordpress.com/?p=831#comment-241</guid>
		<description>Let us not forget the power of the calypso music...

&quot;I can&#039;t believe this macho bullshit!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let us not forget the power of the calypso music&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;I can&#8217;t believe this macho bullshit!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Ten Greatest Action Movie Montages Ever! by Mad Science Films</title>
		<link>http://davidmelkevik.wordpress.com/2009/11/20/the-ten-greatest-action-movie-montages-ever/#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator>Mad Science Films</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidmelkevik.wordpress.com/?p=831#comment-240</guid>
		<description>Good Call on Commando, young impressionable mad scientist saw that a young age, and fell in love with the power of montage ever since.  Eisenstein... pah!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Call on Commando, young impressionable mad scientist saw that a young age, and fell in love with the power of montage ever since.  Eisenstein&#8230; pah!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Ten Greatest Action Movie One-Liners Ever! by Thunder Badger</title>
		<link>http://davidmelkevik.wordpress.com/2009/11/13/the-ten-greatest-action-movie-one-liners/#comment-238</link>
		<dc:creator>Thunder Badger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidmelkevik.wordpress.com/?p=813#comment-238</guid>
		<description>In the words of the also underrrated Buckaroo Banzai:&quot;Hey, hey, hey, don&#039;t be mean. Remember, no matter where you go...there you are.&quot;

Why didn&#039;t he just put the bunny back in the box?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the words of the also underrrated Buckaroo Banzai:&#8221;Hey, hey, hey, don&#8217;t be mean. Remember, no matter where you go&#8230;there you are.&#8221;</p>
<p>Why didn&#8217;t he just put the bunny back in the box?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Ten Greatest Action Movie One-Liners Ever! by Count de Ceredigion</title>
		<link>http://davidmelkevik.wordpress.com/2009/11/13/the-ten-greatest-action-movie-one-liners/#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>Count de Ceredigion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidmelkevik.wordpress.com/?p=813#comment-237</guid>
		<description>Fucking fascist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fucking fascist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Ten Greatest Action Movie One-Liners Ever! by Dave</title>
		<link>http://davidmelkevik.wordpress.com/2009/11/13/the-ten-greatest-action-movie-one-liners/#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidmelkevik.wordpress.com/?p=813#comment-236</guid>
		<description>No they don&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No they don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Ten Greatest Action Movie One-Liners Ever! by Count de Ceredigion</title>
		<link>http://davidmelkevik.wordpress.com/2009/11/13/the-ten-greatest-action-movie-one-liners/#comment-235</link>
		<dc:creator>Count de Ceredigion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidmelkevik.wordpress.com/?p=813#comment-235</guid>
		<description>I suppose the parodies don&#039;t count... but if they do then I&#039;d like to submit &quot;TERRORIZE THIS&quot; from Team America and &quot;By Grabthar&#039;s Hammer I will avenge you&quot; from the astoundingly under-rated Galaxy Quest!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose the parodies don&#8217;t count&#8230; but if they do then I&#8217;d like to submit &#8220;TERRORIZE THIS&#8221; from Team America and &#8220;By Grabthar&#8217;s Hammer I will avenge you&#8221; from the astoundingly under-rated Galaxy Quest!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Ten Greatest Action Movie One-Liners Ever! by Gemma</title>
		<link>http://davidmelkevik.wordpress.com/2009/11/13/the-ten-greatest-action-movie-one-liners/#comment-234</link>
		<dc:creator>Gemma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 09:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidmelkevik.wordpress.com/?p=813#comment-234</guid>
		<description>Indeed. I like it when his eyes get burnt out. What did I call him? Wenier? I hang my head in shame. 

I also really love the &#039;Put the bunny in the bag&#039; exchange in Con Air. LOVE that movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed. I like it when his eyes get burnt out. What did I call him? Wenier? I hang my head in shame. </p>
<p>I also really love the &#8216;Put the bunny in the bag&#8217; exchange in Con Air. LOVE that movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Ten Greatest Action Movie One-Liners Ever! by Dave</title>
		<link>http://davidmelkevik.wordpress.com/2009/11/13/the-ten-greatest-action-movie-one-liners/#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 05:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidmelkevik.wordpress.com/?p=813#comment-233</guid>
		<description>No idea about where the phrase comes from but Yahoo offers a  very logical explanation... http://ask.yahoo.com/20061212.html

Rainier Wolfcastle perfectly captures the genius of the action movie one-liner. However my favourite quote of his is this one...

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=juFZh92MUOY&amp;hl=en_GB&amp;fs=1&amp;]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No idea about where the phrase comes from but Yahoo offers a  very logical explanation&#8230; <a href="http://ask.yahoo.com/20061212.html" rel="nofollow">http://ask.yahoo.com/20061212.html</a></p>
<p>Rainier Wolfcastle perfectly captures the genius of the action movie one-liner. However my favourite quote of his is this one&#8230;</p>
<p><span style="text-align:center; display: block;"><a href="http://davidmelkevik.wordpress.com/2009/12/04/melkevik-on-melkevik/"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/juFZh92MUOY/2.jpg" alt="" /></a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
